Latest news

Showing posts with label women organisations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label women organisations. Show all posts

Friday, 6 September 2013

India & A Blonde Tourist: An alternate account

India & A Blonde Tourist: An alternate account

Sometime back some lady called Michaella made indian mens like villain for nothing might be she was feminists & local feminists made her to write lot of things wrong about indian males.

But here you go with gr8 article which tells positive signs about Indian males...


India
 / 
 / 
Story

India & A Blonde Tourist: An alternate account

Jane von Rabenau

I have read Michaela Cross's experiences in India several times by now. That makes me no different from a million plus people who too have read her blog.

What's different is that I could have gone through the same harrowing experience as her, because I too have been touring India extensively, alone. And yes, I too am white, in my 20s and a foreign female.

I have traveled alone to many parts of India and am now living in Delhi for over two months. I am overwhelmed with the positive and exciting experiences I have made and the hospitality of Indians towards me.

Why has India been so different to me? Have I been simply lucky? Or have I looked at India very differently to get a very different treatment for myself?

Let me compare notes with some of Michaela's experiences to explain what I am saying.

Do Indian men stare at me? Yes, they do... and so do Indian women and kids, and other European travelers.

They stare with the same curiosity that I get stared at in so many other countries I have traveled to in Africa, South America, Eastern and Southern Europe and other Asian countries.

I guess that is a natural reaction to somebody considered exotic.

When I took my Eritrean friend to my grandmother's village in northern Germany, where foreigners are a rarity, she attracted everyone's looks, some containing a hint of racism.

The stares I got from Italian men were typically accompanied with a "Ciao Bella!" This flirtatious attitude is often welcomed and accepted as part of Italy's macho culture.

In India, it is seen as sexual harassment. Why is an Italian man's stare a compliment and an Indian man's stare a curse, bordering on threat?

Do people take photos of me? Yes, they do... but I take many more photos of them!

We Western travellers typically shoot every monument, sight and many people they come across in India, mostly without asking for permission.

These pictures are posted in our Facebook page or travel blogs. But if an Indian takes a photo of a European, we get irritated and feel our privacy is invaded.

Again, isn't there a double standard here? A white skin's privilege is a brown skin's punishment?

Am I the centre of attention at social events? Yes, I am. Thanks to the immense hospitality of Indians, I had the opportunity to attend five weddings and several festivals.

When I was dancing, lots of people wanted to dance with me, and some also took photos and videos of me.

I was the only white person at these functions, and most people had never seen a white woman dancing to Bollywood tunes.

In my case, the attention I got in these functions was no different from the curious and welcoming attention I received at a wedding party in Kosovo.

Did I have any negative experiences with Indian men? Yes, the worst I had was a businessman in my Air India flight from London try to grope my thigh.

But my positive experiences far outweigh the negative ones, even with men. I only had to deal with people trying to sell me stuff and not leaving me alone; and people staring at me.

However, putting myself in the position of a crafts seller trying to feed his family, and knowing that there is a chance that after annoying a tourist enough, he will give in and buy something, I would also prioritise my family over the tourist.

I have been invited to many Indian homes and have been offered food by the poorest families.

I have hardly ever had to stay in hotels as Indians have welcomed me to stay at their family homes, and then organised me to stay at their wife's cousin's friend's house etc...

On many occasions, dhaba owners or fruit sellers insisted on not taking money from me for the food as I am a guest of India.

Can one generalise my account of India? No, one cannot.

In fact, no one's account can and should be generalised -- one sixth of humanity lives in India; there are many Indias in India; every traveller interacts only with a small fraction of Indians, and can thus only give a tiny fragment of the true Indian experience -- whatever that is.

But I believe that we make our experiences as much as our experiences make us.

I now know Hindi fairly well, but even when I didn't, just speaking a few phrases of Hindi, smiling and being open to chat with people around triggered people's hospitality - and that instilled me with a sense of security.

I have generally been more adapting, less suspicious and more trusting.

For instance, on a recent visit to Kasauli with a female English friend, we wore Kurtis and bangles and joked and chatting with every Indian we interacted with-- chaiwalas, pandits, other Indian tourists.

We started chatting with clothes shop owner and had chai with him. A friend of his insisted on showing us around Kasauli and inviting us to his village.

We ended up having dinner with his family - some delicious daal, sabzi and chawal and looked at his beautiful family photo album.

I feel that many a traveller would have a much more exciting, and "real" experience of India if they would just be a more open and friendly towards Indians.

A very thin line divides intrusion from friendliness. I can interpret one as the other, depending on whether I am apprehensive or open.

I am not suggesting India is a heaven for women. You don't need to hear from me the depressing daily occurrences of molestation, sexual assaults and female infanticide.

However, my experience of India and behaviour of Indians towards me has been incredibly positive. Many of my friends had similar experience.

I hope India treats more foreign travellers like it has treated me. Rather than the treatment Michaela received.

Soon, I will get back to London to continue my Bachelor's at LSE. I will have to adjust to a life without any special attention - no ghaar ka khaana from chaiwalas, no chaat papri, no Bollywood dancing and no poojas.

Maybe I will refuse to readjust and come back to India next year.

(Jane von Rabenau, 21, grew up in Frankurt, Germany. She is studying Philosophy and Economics at London School of Economics. She is on a summer internship to Delhi, working in the area of development cooperation. She has travelled across India and many parts of the world extensively)

Here is a link to Michaela Cross' blog that stirred the debate:http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-1023053

Thursday, 15 August 2013

युवती ने झांसा देकर बुलाय था ठेकेदार, सरगना सहित तीन अपहर्ता गिरफ्तार

युवती ने झांसा देकर बुलाय था ठेकेदार, सरगना सहित तीन अपहर्ता गिरफ्तार 


बिलासपुर। ठेकेदार रूपेश अग्रवाल के अपहरण के मामले में पुलिस ने सरगना सहित तीन आरोपियों को गिरफ्तार कर लिया है। एक को पहले ही पकड़ा जा चुका था। पुलिस को अब तक वह युवती नहीं मिली है, जिसने ठेकेदार को झांसा देकर रतनपुर-कोटा रोड में बुलाया था और फिर बाइक की चाबी छीन ली थी। उसकी तलाश की जा रही है।
समता कालोनी निवासी ठेकेदार रूपेश अग्रवाल का 9 अगस्त को कोटा-रतनपुर रोड से दिनदहाड़े अपहरण हो गया था। इस वारदात को एक युवती समेत पांच लोगों ने मिलकर अंजाम दिया था। पुलिस ने अभी तक एक आरोपी जी. श्रीनिवास राव को गिरफ्तार किया था, जो बोलेरो चला रहा था। बाकी आरोपियों की तलाश जारी थी। साइबर सेल ने पकड़े गए आरोपी से पूछताछ की, साथ ही युवती के मोबाइल नंबर की कॉल डिटेल निकाली। आरोपी बिलासपुर में ही रहते थे। साइबर सेल ने इनमें छपरा (बिहार) के ग्राम अरना के राजकिशोर उर्फ राज (25 वर्ष), झारखंड औरंगाबाद बारून के वकील अंसारी (36वर्ष) और भवानी नगर सिरगिट्टी बिलासपुर के गोलू उर्फ लोकेश राव नायडू (24 वर्ष) को गिरफ्तार किया।
राजकिशोर इस वारदात का मास्टरमाइंड था। आरोपी युवती का नाम ममता सिंह है, जो तारबाहर इलाके में रहती है। तारबाहर व रायगढ़ थाने में उसके खिलाफ पहले ही जुर्म दर्ज है। गौरतलब है, ठेकेदार को अपहर्ता झारखंड ले जा रहे थे। इसी बीच अंबिकापुर-पत्थलगांव रोड में बोलेरो दुर्घटनाग्रस्त हो गई और अपहर्ता रूपेश व चालक को छोड़कर भाग निकले। चालक के अनुसार ठेकेदार का अपहरण पांच करोड़ की फिरौती के लिए हुआ था।

ठगी की आरोपी है युवती : अपहरण के मामले में ममता सिंह नामक जिस युवती का नाम आया है, दरअसल उसका घर राजीव गांधी चौक के पास है। वह सिम्स में नौकरी लगाने के मामले में 20 लाख रुपए की ठकी के मामले में भी आरोपी है और खुलासे के बाद से फरार चल रही है। वारदात के समय वह किसी युवक के साथ तारबाहर क्षेत्र में रह रही थी। एक दिन पहले साइबर सेल की टीम उसके घर पहुंची थी और उसके छोटे भाई को पूछताछ के लिए ले गई थी।
एक आरोपी अंबिकापुर में उतर गया था
रतनपुर-कोटा रोड से अपहर्ताओं में से वकील अंसारी कोटा से युवती को लेकर बिलासपुर आ गया था। राजकिशोर, गोलू व ड्राइवर श्रीनिवास ठेकेदार को लेकर बनारस रोड की ओर जा रहे थे। इसी बीच साइबर सेल ने ठेकेदार के मोबाइल पर कॉल किया। इस नंबर को अपहर्ताओं ने अपने मोबाइल से ट्रेस किया तो उसमें बिलासपुर क्राइम ब्रांच का नाम आया। इससे अपहर्ता घबरा गए और रास्ता बदल दिया। अपहर्ताओं ने अंबिकापुर लौटते हुए जशपुर, पत्थलगांव की ओर गाड़ी रोक दी। अंबिकापुर में गोलू उर्फ लोकेश उतर गया। गाड़ी में राजकिशोर व ड्राइवर श्रीनिवास ही रह गए। पकड़े जाने के डर से श्रीनिवास तेज रफ्तार से गाड़ी चला रहा था और गाड़ी दुर्घटनाग्रस्त हो गई। यहां से ड्राइवर व अगवा ठेकेदार रूपेश को पुलिस अपने साथ ले गई, राजकिशोर भाग निकला। फरार सभी आरोपी शहर आ गए थे और पकड़े गए।


http://www.bhaskar.com/article/CHH-BIL-rupesh-kidnapping-case-accused-arrest-bilaspur-news-4347690-NOR.html 

Tuesday, 23 July 2013

TV9 Sting Ops: 'Deal Sangatane' : Cheating Women Welfare Associations 'Exposed' - Full

प्रस्तावित तलाक कानून के कारण पति की संपत्ति लुटने के कागार पे है!

प्रस्तावित तलाक कानून के कारण पति की संपत्ति लुटने के कागार पे है!

सरकार की अति सक्रियता हिन्दू विवाह अधिनियम को संशोधित करने की परेशानी और अचम्भे में डालती है. इस सरकार का कार्यकाल एक साल के भीतर ही ख़त्म होने वाला है लिहाज़ा ये अति सक्रियता आत्मघाती है. सम्पति के बटवारे के बारे में इसकी टेढ़ी चाल भारतीय परिवारों के विघटन का कारण बन सकती है. इस बटवारे वाले सेक्शन को लेकर जो उहापोह स्थिति उत्पन्न हो गयी है सरकार के भीतर उससे स्पष्ट है कि इस सरकार के मंत्री खुद भ्रम के स्थिति में है और वो एकमत रूख नहीं रखते है इस कानून में निहित संपत्ति बंटवारे और मुआवजे से सम्बंधित बिन्दुओ पर. हिंदू विवाह अधिनियम’ की धारा 13-बी और ‘विशेष विवाह अधिनियम’ की धारा 28 आपसी सहमति से तलाक के अंतर्गत संपत्ति बंटवारे/ मुआवज़े पर जो सरकार के भीतर अन्तर्विरोध उभर कर आये है उससे ये समझ में आता है कि सरकार में शामिल मंत्रियो से लेकर अन्य पार्टी के सांसदों को ज्यादा कुछ नहीं पता है इस कानून के मूल तत्वों का. इससे ये सहज ही समझा जा सकता है कि जनता जिसका वो प्रतिनिधित्व करते है उनमे कितना भ्रम व्याप्त होगा। फिर भी ये सरकार इस संशोधन को इतनी जल्दबाजी में कानूनी जामा पहनाना चाहती है ये हैरान करता है.
ये बताना आवश्यक रहेगा कि सरकार ने संशोधन को पास कराने की हड़बड़ी में लॉ कमिशन और संसदीय स्थायी समिति को पूरी प्रक्रिया से बाहर रखा है. इसके खतरनाक दुष्परिणाम होंगे और भारत के युवक-युवतियों का भविष्य अँधेरे के गर्त में जा सकता है. ये निश्चित है कि अगर ये बिल अपने प्रस्तावित स्वरूप में पास हो गया तो ये एक और उदाहरण होगा गैर जिम्मेदाराना तरीके से अस्तित्व में लाये गए कानून का जो प्रक्रियागत खामियों से लैस होगा। लिहाज़ा सेव इंडिया फॅमिली फाउंडेशन (SIFF) हिंदी विवाह अधिनियम (संशोधन) बिल, २०१०, को अपने वर्तमान स्वरुप में अस्वीकार करती है और इसको वापस लेने का आग्रह करती है. इसके इस स्वरूप में पारित कराने का तीव्र विरोध करती है.
सेव इंडिया फॅमिली फाउंडेशन (SIFF) का ये भी कहना है कि न्यायधीशो को इस कानून के तहत असीमित अधिकार देना किसी तरह से भी जायज नहीं है खासकर महिलाओ से संबधित मासिक गुज़ारा भत्ता /मुआवज़े के निर्धारण में. लिहाज़ा  सेव इंडिया फॅमिली फाउंडेशन (SIFF) अपनी असहमति दर्ज कराती है.
कुछ आवश्यक बिंदु:  इस कानून को महिलाओ के पक्ष में बताना खतरनाक है क्योकि भारत में सत्तर प्रतिशत परिवार गरीब वर्ग में है जो ज्यादातर क़र्ज़ में डूबे है और जिनके पास संपत्ति नाम की कोई चीज़ नहीं है, जिनके ऊपर पहले से ही बेटी बेटो के भरण पोषण और उनके शादी ब्याह जैसी जिम्मेदारियां है. ये कानून केवल एक ख़ास वर्ग में सिमटी धनी महिलाओ को ध्यान में रखकर अस्तित्व में आया है. भारतीय जनता पार्टी, समाजवादी पार्टी, बहुजन समाज पार्टी जैसे राजनैतिक दलों को इसके विरोध में खड़े होकर इसके खिलाफ वोटिंग करनी चाहिए। ऐसा इसलिए कि इस कानून के पारित होने के बाद तलाक के प्रतिशत में अगले दस सालो में लभग तीस प्रतिशत तक की बढ़ोत्तरी हो सकती है.
प्रस्तावित हिन्दू विवाह संशोधन को सम्पूर्णता में देखे जाने की जरूरत है जैसे कि संयुक्त रूप से बच्चो का भरण पोषण, बच्चों की जिम्मेदारियों के वहन से सम्बंधित कानून की रौशनी में. सिर्फ मासिक भत्ते के निर्धारण में सक्रियता दिखाना उचित नहीं। क्या पति ताउम्र भत्ता गुज़ारा देता रहेगा संपत्ति बंटवारे के बाद भी जिसका हिस्सा खुद की संपत्ति और विरासत में मिली संपत्ति से मिलकर बनता है? ये कुछ अति महत्त्वपूर्ण बिंदु है जिनको संज्ञान में लेना आवश्यक है और इन्हें उनके बीच चर्चा में शामिल करना है जो इन कानूनों से प्रभावित हो रहे है. अव्यवस्थित रूप से निर्धारित बिन्दुओ को कानून बना के पास करना बेहद गलत है.
 सेव इंडिया फॅमिली फाउंडेशन (SIFF) का सरकार को निम्नलिखित सुझाव:
 
सरकार इस कानून को तुरंत वापस लें और मौजूदा संसदीय अधिवेशन में इसे ना पेश करे. सरकार इस कानून की भाषा में परिवतन करे और इस लिंग आधारित भेदों से ऊपर करे जिसमे पति (husband) और पत्नी (wife) को ” जीवनसाथी” ( spouse) और स्त्री (man) और पुरुष (woman) को ” व्यक्ति” (person) में परिवर्तित किया जाए. इसके साथ ही किसी भी जीवनसाथी को तलाक़ अर्जी का विरोध करने की छूट हो कानून की समानता के रौशनी में. सरकार इस बात का भी निर्धारण करे कि अर्जित संपत्ति के निर्माण में पत्नी का क्या सहयोग रहा है या पति के परिवार के भौतिक सम्पदा के विस्तार में क्या योगदान है. इसको निर्धारित करने का सूत्र विकसित किया जाए. इसके निर्धारण में शादी के अवधि को ध्यान में रखा जाए, बच्चो की संख्या का ध्यान रखा जाए, और क्या स्त्री कामकाजी है या घरेलु. अगर स्त्री तीन बच्चो की माता है, वृद्ध सदस्यों की देखरेख का जिम्मा ले रखा है, तो उसका योगदान अधिक है बजाय उस स्त्री के जो कामकाजी है और जिसके कोई बच्चे नहीं है एक साल की अवधि में.
इस सूत्र के मुताबिक ही किसी व्यवस्था को संचालित किया जाए जीवनसाथी को मासिक भरण पोषण के सन्दर्भ में, मुआवज़े के सन्दर्भ में या या किसी और समझौते के सन्दर्भ में. न्यायधीश महोदय इस सूत्र की रौशनी में अपने विवेक का इस्तेमाल कर उचित फैसले लें. लिहाज़ा इस सूत्र के अंतर्गत अगर स्त्री के सहयोग का अनुपात पति या उसके परिवार के संपत्ति के अर्जन में पूरी संपत्ति के मूल्य से अधिक है तो उसे पूरी संपत्ति पर हक दिया जा सकता है. अगर पत्नी इसको लेने से इनकार कर सकती है तो वो मासिक गुज़ारे भत्ते वाले विकल्प को अपना सकती है. कहने का तात्पर्य ये है कि संपत्ति में हिस्सेदारी के बाद उसका मासिक गुज़ारे भत्ते को लेते रहने का अधिकार ख़त्म हो जाता है. दोनों विकल्पों का लाभ लेने का हक जीवनसाथी को नहीं मिलना चहिये. सरकार को इस सूत्र को अस्तित्व में लाने के लिए एक कमेटी या योजना आयोग का गठन करना चाहिए.
सरकार को सयुंक्त भरण पोषण का अधिकार बच्चे के बायोलॉजिकल अभिभावक द्वारा और बच्चे के ग्रैंड पेरेंट्स से स्थायी संपर्क को अनिवार्य कर दिया जाए, जब तक कि कोर्ट इसके विपरीत राय ना रखती हो. इसके अनुपालन के अभाव को आपराधिक जुर्म के श्रेणी में रखाजाए। अगर कोई अभिभावक इस सयुंक्त भरण पोषण के जिम्मेदारी से मुंह मोड़ रहा है या ग्रैंड पेरेंट्स से संपर्क में बाधा डाल रहा है तो इसको अपराध माना जाए.
सरकार ये सुनिश्चित करे कि न्यायालय को अपने विवेक के अधिकार का इस्तेमाल करने की सीमित आज़ादी हो संपत्ति बटवारे के निर्धारण में, मासिक गुज़ारे भत्ते के सन्दर्भ में और बच्चे के पालन पोषण सम्बन्धी मामलो में. बहुत ज्यादा अधिकार न्यायालय को देने का मतलब ये होगा कि कोर्ट का अवांछित हस्तक्षेप मामले को और जटिल बना देगा या कोर्ट का गैर जिम्मेदाराना रूख स्थिति को और विकृत कर देगा। अधिकतर पुरुष फॅमिली कोर्ट पे भरोसा नहीं करते, क्योकि इस तरह की कोर्टपुरुषो के अधिकार के प्रति असंवेदनशील रही है. न्यायालय वर्षो लगा देती है पति को अपने बच्चो से मिलने का फैसला देने में और तब तक बच्चे की स्मृति पिता के सन्दर्भ में धूमिल पड़ जाती है.
सरकार ये सुनिश्चित करे कि महिला पैतृक संपत्ति और वहा अर्जित संपत्ति में जो हिस्सेदारी बनती हो उसे अधिग्रहित करे. उसे अपने कब्जे में लें. सरकार को हिन्दू विवाह अधिनियम में संशोधन करके महिला को अपने पिता के घर में रहने का स्थान सुनिश्चित करे , ताकि कम अवधि वाली शादी में अलगाव की सूरत में उसे रहने की जगह उपलब्ध हो. अगर माता पिता इस सूरत में उसे पति के घर जाने के लिये विवश करते है तो इसे अपराध की श्रेणी में रखा जाए. इसी प्रकार अगर महिला के माता पिता या महिला के भाई उसे पैतृक संपत्ति/ अर्जित संपत्ति में हिस्सा देने से इनकार करते है तो इसे असंज्ञेय प्रकार का अपराध माना जाए.
 

Monday, 22 July 2013

The forgotten women: MiLs take on DiLs

The forgotten women: MiLs take on DiLs

She does not seem to like Ekta Kapoor. And she is fighting a tough and rare battle which many people frown upon. She is that part of the society which has been branded as the ‘accepted vamps’. She is Neena Dhulia, a mother, but unfortunately, she is also a mother-in-law. Today, she is in a convoluted battle for the deserved rights of the ‘forgotten women of India’ - the mother-in-laws (MiL).
Up against a society which has often termed MiLs as the demon and daughter-in-law (DiL) as the sati savitri, the laconic Neena has support from over 3000 other MiLs who have been harassed by their DiLs. Having founded the All India Mother-in-Law Protection Forum (AIMPF) in 2009 in Bangalore, she is on a dragooned mission, expressing her remorse, hoping that it will explode silently and effectually redound in the society.
“From seven members, today we have around 3000 members and all are mother-in-laws harassed by daughter-in-laws. We used to visit the The Save Indian Family Foundation (SIFF) which is a men’s rights organisation, every Sunday at Cubbon Park. It was here that mothers of harassed husbands started meeting and then one fine day, we decided to have a forum for ourselves so that our grievances are also heard,” said the 60-year-old Neena.
Fighting for justice, and more so, fighting to clear her name as the plotting and villainous MiL, she also has the strong support of her son, Virag who is an active member of the SIFF. Her trouble began when he married. Within two months, his wife left home because she did not want to stay with his parents. Thus, began the journey of the percipient mother and son to fight for justice, a fight for which they have been innocently pushed towards.
And the anger that has been building within her is evident when she speaks. “Today there are 15 laws for daughter-in-laws but none for mother-in-laws or sister-in-laws. These 15 laws are being grossly misused. We contacted the National Commission for Women and have written numerous letters, but they have vehemently refused to address our problems. We are not in their mandate,” said Neena.
According to her, the society, the print and electronic media have constantly been portraying mother-in-laws as monsters and vamps. “All the years, we care for our child and as soon as marriage happens, we become the demon. No mother would want to ruin her son’s life. It is false propaganda which is breaking up families. Today it is so easy for a daughter-in-law to go to a police station and file a complaint. It is like ordering a pizza. In many cases, it is just extortion,” she states.
Neena lambasts the government because she says that while today, the government has made laws like the 498 A and the Domestic Violence Act wherein a daughter-in-law can file a complaint but not a mother-in-law.
But her fight is long and she is hopeful. “I am sure the change will happen. Today, at least the mindset has changed. Earlier people were not even accepting that false cases were being registered,” she adds.
 
 
http://newindianexpress.com/cities/bangalore/article1508482.ece 

Friday, 19 July 2013

New bill gives woman share in ex-husband’s inherited property

New bill gives woman share in ex-husband’s inherited property

NEW DELHI: A wife will have a share in her husband's inherited or inheritable marital property on divorce, though the exact quantum of the compensation has been left to the discretion of the judge, according to a legislation that was cleared by the Union Cabinet on Wednesday.
The Cabinet also cleared the proposal that in cases where divorce has been sought on mutual consent of both parties the judiciary has been given the discretion to grant divorce to one party after a period of three years, even if the man and the wife are no longer on the same page. These were part of the recommendations of the GoM on Marriage Laws Amendment Bill which will now be amended suitably before being brought to Parliament during the monsoon session, beginning August 5.

 http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-07-17/india/40634500_1_mutual-consent-marital-property-divorce-case

IrBM Are new divorce laws anti-men?

Wednesday, 17 July 2013

मैरिज एक्ट में संशोधनः महिलाओं को मिलेगा पैतृक संपत्ति में हिस्सा और भी...

मैरिज एक्ट में संशोधनः महिलाओं को मिलेगा पैतृक संपत्ति में हिस्सा   और भी... 

हिंदू मैरिज एक्ट में संशोधन को लेकर आखिरकार कैबिनेट ने फैसला ले लिया. मैरिज एक्ट में जो संशोधन किए गए हैं, उनके मुताबिक पैतृक संपत्ति में अब महिलाओं को भी हक मिलेगा.
महिलाओं को पिता और पति की संपत्ति में भी हिस्सेदारी मिलेगी हालांकि कितना हिस्सा मिलेगा इसका फैसला कोर्ट करेगी. इस संशोधन के बाद तलाक लेना अब पहले से ज्यादा आसान हो जाएगा.
क्या है हिन्‍दू मैरिज एक्‍ट?
शादियों को कानूनी शर्त में बांधन के लिए हिंदू मैरेज एक्ट बना था. ये बात आजादी के 8 साल बाद 1955 की है. तब से लेकर इस एक्ट में तमाम संशोधन हुए. हमारी परंपरा में कहावत तो ये है कि शादियां स्वर्ग मे तय होती हैं. इसे निबाहने के लिए 7 फेरों के 7 वचन ही काफी हैं. लेकिन बदलते जमाने की ये सहजता कई पेचिदगियों से भर चुकी है. इन्हीं पेचिदगियों से बचने के लिए लिए संविधान में हिंदू मैरिज एक्ट का प्रवाधान किया गया था.
शादियों को टूटने से बचाने और इसे कानूनी शर्तों में बांधने के लिए 1955 में हिंदू मैरिज एक्ट बनाया गया. मगर टूटते बिखरते रिश्तों का आलम ये है, कि कोर्ट को भी एक्ट को लचीला बनाना पड़ा.
अगर किसी भी शादी को बचाने की कोई गुंजाइश नहीं बची हो, रिश्ता तोड़ने पर पति-पत्नी दोनों सहमत हों, तो 6 महीने की ‘कूलिंग पीरियड’ से पहले भी तलाक दिया जा सकता है. देश की ऊंची अदालत ने ये फैसला तो एक निजी मामले में दिया था. लेकिन ये फैसला इशारा करता है, रिश्तों की घुटन से मुक्ति पाने की छटपटाहट वक्त के साथ कितनी बढ़ती गई है. इसी के साथ हिंदू मैरिज एक्ट में संशोधनों भी किए जाते रहे हैं.
मसलन, मूल कानून में लड़कों के लिए शादी की उम्र 18 साल और लड़कियों की 15 साल थी, जिसे आगे चलकर 21 साल और 18 साल किया गया. पहले हिंदू रीति रिवाजों से हुई शादी को मान्य माना जाता था, आगे चलकर इसमें कानूनी पंजीकरण का प्रावधान किया गया. तलाक की शर्तों में भी बदलाव किया जाता रहा. तलाक के बाद बीवियों को मुआवजे का ख्याल रखा गया.


http://aajtak.intoday.in/story/cabinet-decision-on-marriage-act--1-736357.html

Monday, 15 July 2013

Man commits suicide over wife's infidelity

Man commits suicide over wife's infidelity


SURAT: Munna Patel, operator in a textile embroidery unit in Katargam area killed self by consuming poisonous material. Patel consumed pesticide at his residence after a tussle with his wife.
Patel consumed pesticide on Wednesday and was rushed to hospital. He died during treatment at the hospital on Saturday. Patel's family claimed that he consumed pesticide as he was upset with birth of child to his wife.
Patel became father recently but he had doubt about his wife's relationship with other man. He started questioning his wife about her relationship with other man since she returned home after birth of a child. He questioned her that 'who is father of the child?' Patel told his wife that she was staying at village since long and not with him. Since they were not living together for a long period, Patel claimed that he is not father of the child.
Over the issue they fought with each other several times. Upset due to his belief Patel threatened to kill self and on not getting any satisfactory reply he ended life. Family members attempted to end the dispute between the couple but it did not help. Police are now questioning the family members to get more information in the case.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/21079872.cms?intenttarget=no

IT employee jumps to death from office building

IT employee jumps to death from office building

CHENNAI: In the fourth incident in a month, an engineering graduate employed with an IT firm committed suicide by jumping from the terrace of a building at Kanthanchavadi on Rajiv Gandhi Salai (Old Mahabalipuram Road) on Sunday.

A Naveen Kumar, 28, of Vellore district jumped to death at 12.02pm from the terrace of Prince Info City building on OMR, allegedly after a tiff with his girlfriend.

Police said Naveen had gone to the 11th floor of the building with a co-worker. He told his co-worker he needed to make a call and went up to the terrace. He left his mobile on the terrace and then jumped to death. A security guard, who heard a loud thud, rushed to the parking area and found Naveen lying in a pool of blood.

After checking call details, police found that he had called his girlfriend at least four times on Sunday. "He was not in good terms with his girlfriend for the past one week as they had a tiff over their wedding," said an investigating officer.

Though the gate to the terrace was shut and the security guard at the main gate keeps the key, some employees had managed to break the lock to smoke on the terrace," said a security guard.

A colleague of Naveen said the latter had been depressed since morning. Though his shift was over at 11.30am, he did not leave the office. Naveen was employed on a sub-contract basis with Maersk for the past four months. He stayed at Kannagi Nagar. 
 http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/IT-employee-jumps-to-death-from-office-building/articleshow/21075515.cms 

Wednesday, 10 July 2013

प्रेमी संग नहर में कूदी विवाहिता का शव मिला

प्रेमी संग नहर में कूदी विवाहिता का शव मिला

गोरखपुर के पास युवक संग नहर में कूदने वाली मीरपुर निवासी विवाहिता मंजू का शव बरामद हो गया है। बुधवार को उसका शव काजलहैड के पास मिला। पुलिस ने पोस्टमार्टम के बाद शव परिजनों को सौंप दिया। इस मामले में फिलहाल अग्रोहा थाना पुलिस कार्रवाई कर रही है।
मंजू का कथित प्रेमी गांव ढाणी माजरा निवासी संदीप अभी तक लापता है।
मृतका मंजू गाव नाढ़ोड़ी निवासी पृथ्वी सिंह नामक व्यक्ति से ब्याही हुई थी। मंजू काफी दिनों से अपने मायके मीरपुर गई हुई थी। बताते है रविवार 16 जून को गाव ढाणी माजरा निवासी संदीप ने मोबाईल कर मंजू को गाव गोरखपुर के पास बुला लिया। यहां दोनों एक साथ सिद्धमुख भाखड़ा नहर में कूद गए। जिस स्थान पर संदीप व मंजू नहर में कूदे थे उसके पास ही कुछ लोग भेड़ें चरा रहे थे व कुछ किसान भी वहा खड़े थे। इन लोगों ने देखा कि एक युवक-युवती प्लसर बाईक पर नहर के पुल के पास आए। उस वक्त दोनों उल्टिया कर रहे थे। देखते ही देखते युवती ने अपनी चुन्नी व चप्पल उतारकर नहर के किनारे रख दी व उसके बाद युवक-युवती ने नहर में छलाग लगा दी। नहर में कूदा संदीप तैरना जानता था, वह तैरकर बाहर आ गया और बाईक पर सवार होकर मौके से भाग निकला। इस मामले में मृतका के पति ने पुलिस को शिकायत देकर संदीप पर हत्या का आरोप भी लगाया था। अब मामले की जांच अग्रोहा पुलिस कर रही है।

http://www.jagran.com/haryana/fatehabad-10492101.html 

Tuesday, 9 July 2013

पत्नी से छुटकारा पाने को अपनाया इस्लाम

पत्नी से छुटकारा पाने को अपनाया इस्लाम

हिसार [सुनील मान]। हरियाणा पुलिस में कार्यरत पत्नी से छुटकारा पाने के लिए एक व्यक्ति ने इस्लाम धर्म अपना लिया। गांव गढ़ी अजीमा के सुरेंद्र से सिकंदर अली बने इस व्यक्ति का कहना है कि वह पत्नी की दबंगई से परेशान है और उसके साथ नहीं रहना चाहता।
सुरेंद्र की शादी हिंदू रीति-रिवाज से 12 दिसंबर 2008 को ओढ़ा निवासी युवती के साथ हुई थी। उसकी पत्नी हरियाणा पुलिस में कांस्टेबल के पद पर कार्यरत है, जबकि सुरेंद्र गोहाना के इलाहाबाद बैंक में कार्यरत है। शादी के कुछ समय के बाद ही दोनों में अनबन रहने लगी तो दोनों में तकरार न हो इसके लिए काफी बार पंचायत भी हुई। सुरेंद्र का आरोप है कि उसकी पत्नी उसे पुलिस में होने की दादागिरी चलाती है। सुरेंद्र ने बताया कि वह उसकी पुलिसगिरी से तंग आ चुका है। पत्नी से छुटकारा पाने के लिए हिंदू धर्म को छोड़कर उसने इस्लाम को अपनाने का रास्ता चुना। सुरेंद्र ने गत पांच जुलाई को दिल्ली की जामा मस्जिद में मुस्लिम रीति-रिवाजों से यह धर्म अपना लिया है। उसने कहा कि वह अपना जीवन अच्छे तरीके से जीना चाहता है और जल्द ही दूसरी शादी भी कर लेगा।

http://www.jagran.com/news/national-man-change-his-religion-due-to-wife-attitude-10545194.html?src=gg_home 

Monday, 8 July 2013

प्रेमी के साथ मिलकर पत्नी ने की पति को मारने की कोशिश

प्रेमी के साथ मिलकर पत्नी ने की पति को मारने की कोशिश

भिवंडी।। आगरा रोड स्थित यूनुस नगर में रहने वाली एक महिला ने प्रेमी के साथ मिलकर पति की हत्या का प्रयास किया। भिवंडी शहर पुलिस ने महिला और उसके प्रेमी को गिरफ्तार कर लिया है। पुलिस के अनुसार, रुआब अली खान (33) पत्नी नसीम बानो (30) के साथ रहता था। रुआब अली बीमार रहता था। उधर, नसीम का पिछले डेढ़ साल से मोहम्मद रफीक सैय्यद (27) से प्रेम संबंध चल रहा था। पर, दोनों के प्रेम के बीच रुआब आड़े आ रहा था। उसे रास्ते से हटाने के लिए दोनों ने उसकी हत्या की योजना बनाई।

नसीम और रफीक ने रुआब के गले में रस्सी डालकर गला दबाने की कोशिश की। रुआब बेहोश हो गया, पर आरोपियों ने उसे मरा हुआ समझकर छोड़ दिया। जब उसे होश आया, तो उसने पुलिस में शिकायत दर्ज कराई।


http://navbharattimes.indiatimes.com/mumbai-crime/wife-with-lover-to-kill-husband/articleshow/20961555.cms 

Woman tramples live-in partner to death

Woman tramples live-in partner to death

CHENNAI: Police on Saturday claimed to have solved the July 2 murder of a real estate agent in Thirukazhukundram, 45km from Chennai, with the arrest of his live-in partner.

Serena, 32, trampled Suresh Kumar, 31, to death when he was asleep because he had objected to her friendship with a woman named Gowri, police said. Kumar was heavily drunk at the time. She then hung his body from the ceiling.

The next morning she alerted neighbours saying she had woken up to find Kumar hanging. Soon, police arrived on the scene and began investigations. Not convinced with Serena's answers, police registered a case of murder but initially suspected the hand of an outsider. "However, Serena remained on the list of suspects list as she was present in the house at the time," a police officer said.
It was thought that he had been strangled, but the injury on one side of the neck ruled out this possibility. The usual marks associated with it were absent, police said. But the symptoms present made it clear he was murdered.
Unable to make up their minds about the cause of death, police again turned their attention to Serena after rejecting the chances of an outsider having committing the crime. She was taken to the police station and questioned separately by a team of women personnel. She finally confessed to the killing.
Inquiries revealed that Suresh Kumar, a resident of Vallam near Chengalpet, had been living with Serena for the past couple of years. Serena, whose husband lived and worked abroad, resided at a house in Thirukazhukundram with her son and daughter. Trouble began between the couple when Suresh Kumar objected to Serena's friendship with Gowri and they often fought over the issue.
At night on July 1, a fresh altercation broke out over the subject before the couple went to sleep. Later, Serena woke up and trod on Kumar's neck with her foot, according to her confession statement. She later hung the body from the ceiling and went to sleep.
Serena has been remanded in judicial custody.

http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-07-07/chennai/40420329_1_serena-suresh-kumar-live-in-partner

Woman throws acid on husband

Woman throws acid on husband


KOLKATA: A heated argument between a young couple spun out of control on Wednesday night, as the woman allegedly threw acid on her husband's face.
The incident took place in Sodepur on the northern fringes of the city. Incidentally, both husband and wife are classmates at Guru Nanak Dental College in Agarpara.

Subhobrata Sanyal, the husband, lodged an FIR with Khardah police station. But since both are final-year medical students, police have decided to wait till their final examinations before making any arrests, if necessary. The woman has been asked to proceed to her parents' house in Bankura.
Sriparna Ghosh Sanyal (26) fell in love with Subhobrata at the medical college. The relationship blossomed and the couple tied the knot in 2005.
But soon, differences emerged and they started bickering. Quarrels are routine, said neighbours. "Initially, we thought these were regular conjugal tiffs. But they fought too frequently. Amazingly, minutes after a fight, they would patch up. But on Wednesday, things got out of hand," said a neighbour.
Sriparna, in a fit of rage, allegedly threw carbolic acid - generally used to ward off snakes - on her husband's face. "But within seconds, she had realized what she had done and quickly wiped the acid off his face. Thankfully, the injury was not serious," said a policeman.
Subhobrata first got himself treated at Panihati State General Hospital. Then, boiling with anger, he walked into Khardah police station and lodged a complaint against his wife. Luckily, police saw the delicacy of the situation and decided to play counsellors.
"We will probe the matter but our intention is not to break the marriage. The incident happened in a moment of anger. Both husband and wife understood that. Sriparna is repentant. So, we have desisted from arresting her. They have their careers ahead of them and if they live separately, they can pay attention to their studies," an investigator said.

http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2008-08-22/kolkata/27898877_1_acid-young-couple-husband-and-wife 

नौकरी जाने का कारण बनने वाली पत्नी से तलाक उचित

नौकरी जाने का कारण बनने वाली पत्नी से तलाक उचित

नई दिल्ली। अगर किसी महिला के कारण उसके पति की नौकरी चली जाती है तो यह तलाक का एक ठोस आधार है। इस टिप्पणी के साथ तीसहजारी कोर्ट की अतिरिक्त जिला न्यायाधीश सीमा मैनी ने पूर्व सिविल जज को उनकी पत्‍‌नी, जो खुद भी जज हैं, से तलाक को मंजूरी प्रदान की।
हरियाणा के एक पूर्व सिविल जज ने अपने अधिवक्ता अमित साहनी के माध्यम से दिल्ली में न्यायिक अधिकारी के रूप में कार्यरत अपनी पत्‍‌नी से तलाक के लिए अदालत में याचिका दायर की थी।
याचिका में पूर्व सिविल जज ने कहा था कि उन्होंने वर्ष 2009 में हरियाणा न्यायिक सेवा में कार्यरत एक महिला जज से प्रेम विवाह किया था। बाद में उनकी पत्‍‌नी ने हरियाणा में नौकरी से त्यागपत्र दे दिया और दिल्ली न्यायिक सेवा में नौकरी कर ली। खुद के विवाहित होने की बात छिपाते हुए दिल्ली में रहने लगी।
विवाह के लिए रिश्ते खोजने वाली एक वेबसाइट पर अपना प्रोफाइल भी डाल दिया। यही नहीं, महिला जज ने अपने के खिलाफ पंजाब एंड हरियाणा हाईकोर्ट में शिकायत की। जिसके कारण महिला जज के पति को अपनी नौकरी गंवानी पड़ी। शिकायतकर्ता का आरोप था कि महिला जज अक्सर उसे फोन पर धमकाती है और उसके घर पर जाकर झगड़ा करती है। जिससे उसकी जिंदगी नरक बन गई है। लिहाजा, उसे तलाक दिया जाए। अदालत ने पत्‍‌नी के पति की नौकरी जाने का कारण बनने को तलाक का ठोस आधार मानते हुए पूर्व जज को पत्‍‌नी से तलाक प्रदान किया।

http://www.jagran.com/news/national-9092031.html 

No more mechanical addition of Murder charges in Dowry Death Cases

No more mechanical addition of Murder charges in Dowry Death Cases


In a significant Judgment, the Supreme Court has practically put an end to the practice of mechanically adding the charge of Murder (S.302 IPC) in all Dowry Death Cases(S.304 IPC) by Trial Judges following a blanket directive of the Supreme Court in Rajibir v. State of Haryana (AIR 2011 SC 568).
It was on 22nd November 2010, the Bench headed by Justice Katju, along with Justice Gyan Sudha Misra issued a direction to the Trial Courts. The Court said;
“We further direct all Trial Courts in India to ordinarily add Section 302 to the charge of section 304B, so that death sentences can be imposed in such heinous and barbaric crimes against women”.
The order surprised many, as it came from a Judge who, on every occasion cautioned the Courts against judicial legislation. In Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, Justice Katju referred the question regarding compounding of non-compoundable offences to larger Bench by holding that the Court cannot amend the statute and must maintain judicial restraint in this connection. He also reminded that the Courts should not try to take over the function of the Parliament or Executive.  Interestingly, contradicting himself, above direction was passed to add the charge of murder in all cases falling under Section 304B. The Bench even forgot the legal principle that the act of framing charge is not an empty formality. The order ignored the settled legal position that a charge can be framed only if the records prima facie reveal facts which constitute an offence thus charged. The direction virtually amended Section 216 of Cr.P.C, thereby restraining the Trial Courts from applying their minds to the facts and circumstances of each case while framing a Court charge.
As a result, even in cases in which records reveal that the victim has committed suicide, Trial Courts were bound to frame charge for murder!!
The Supreme Court while considering the present case found that though the Trial Court did not find any evidence to invoke the murder charge, it was constrained to frame charge for murder solely to comply with Justice Katju’s judgment. In the charge it was stated as follows;
“Even otherwise, the directions of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Rajbir @ Raju & Anr. Vs. State of Haryana in Special Leave Petition bearing No. 9507/2010 decided on 22-11-2010 duly circulated vide No. 33760- 69/DHC/Gaz/G-X/SCJ/2010 dated 3-12-2010, specific directions have been issued to all the subordinate Courts in India to ordinarily add Section 302 IPC to the charge under Section 304B IPC. Therefore, this being the background, charge under Section 302 IPC is being framed in alternative against the accused persons against whom charge under Section 304 B IPC had been framed. The accused pleaded not guilty and claimed trial.”
The Delhi High Court upheld the above order of the Trial Court presumably to comply with the directive in Rajbir Case and the other directions in Suganti vs. Jagdesan (AIR 2002 SC 681) in which it was held as follows. ”
“It is impermissible for the High Court to overrule the decision of the apex Court on the ground that Supreme Court laid down the legal position without considering any other point. It is not only a matter of discipline for the High Courts in India, it is the mandate of the Constitution as provided in Article 141 that the law declared by the Supreme Court shall be binding on all Courts within the territory of India”
The judgment delivered on 2nd July 2013 by the Supreme Court Bench consisting of Justice T S Thakur and Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai has quashed the charge framed by the Trial Court under Section 302 IPC and remitted the matter back to the Trial Court for a fresh consideration. The Bench said;
“The Trial Court in that view of the matter acted mechanically for it framed an additional charge under Section 302 IPC without adverting to the evidence adduced in the case and simply on the basis of the direction issued in Rajbir’s case (supra). The High Court no doubt made a half hearted attempt to justify the framing of the charge independent of the directions in Rajbir’s case (supra), but it would have been more appropriate to remit the matter back to the Trial Court for fresh orders rather than lending support to it in the manner done by the High Court”.
The Supreme Court has now clarified the direction in Rajbir by observing that;
“Be that as it may the common thread running through both the orders is that this Court had in Rajbir’s case (supra) directed the addition of a charge under Section 302 IPC to every case in which the accused are charged with Section 304-B. That was not, in our opinion, the true purport of the order passed by this Court. The direction was not meant to be followed mechanically and without due regard to the nature of the evidence available in the case. All that this Court meant to say was that in a case where a charge alleging dowry death is framed, a charge under Section 302 can also be framed if the evidence otherwise permits.”
There cannot be any scope for doubt on the directive in Rajbir and it was so clear that the Trial Court and the High Court have no choice but to comply with the order literally. Though Rajbir did not contain the words “if the evidence otherwise permits”, it has now been explained by the Supreme Court, by adding such an expression, which it did not actually contain.
But those who know the zero tolerance approach of Justice Katju’s towards dowry deaths would easily realise that Rajbir was his final attempt to award death penalty in all dowry death cases, against his own advice to curb judicial legislation.
In Nathu v. State of U.P while hearing a bail application [Application No: 12466 of 2002] Justice Katju observed, “In my opinion dowry death is worse than murder but surprisingly there is no death penalty for it whereas death penalty can be given for murder. In my opinion the time has come when law be amended and death sentence should be permitted in case of dowry deaths”. He also directed that a copy of the order be sent by the Registrar to Law Minister and Home Minister with a request that they might consider introducing a Bill in the Parliament for such amendment or an ordinance by the Central Government to the same effect.”
Pursuant to the direction in Nathu v. State the Law Commission of India examined the question “whether Section 304B of IPC should be amended to provide for more stringent punishment of death to curb the menace of dowry deaths. In its 202nd report dated 9th October, 2007 the Commission concluded that “we do not recommend amendment of Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code to provide for death sentence as the maximum punishment in case of dowry death”.
On 28th October, 2010 in Satya Narayan Tiwari vs. State of U.P. (2010) 13 SCC 689) while upholding the conviction of the accused U/S 304B and 498A the Bench  headed by Justice Katju wrote “”In fact, it was really a case under S.302 IPC and death sentence should have been imposed in such a case, but since no charge under S.302 IPC was levelled, we cannot do so, otherwise, such cases of bride burning, in our opinion, fall in the category of rarest of rare cases, and hence deserve death sentence”. It seems, finally the Bench thought of venturing into judicial legislation and just after three weeks, the same Bench delivered the Rajbir Judgment. 

http://www.livelaw.in/no-more-mechanical-addition-of-murder-charges-in-dowry-death-cases/

Missing activist's bones found, wife killed him

Missing activist's bones found, wife killed him

NEW DELHI: Six months after a social activist and local communist leader from Bawana in north Delhi went missing under mysterious circumstances, the crime branch has disclosed that he was murdered by his wife and her brothers-in-law.

The cops have recovered the skeleton and other remnants of Ramcharan Ram (60) and arrested his wife Janki Devi (45) and her brother-in-law Vinod Kumar (35). Cops are still looking for another accused, Jhagru, who is also Janki's brother-in-law. Vinod and Jhagru are self styled godmen.

Janki was afraid of losing the property as Ram was having an affair, police said, adding that her brothers-in-law were enraged after the leader brutally thrashed his wife.

The case was cracked after the special operation squad (SOS) of crime branch received a tip-off that the missing leader may have been murdered and buried by his wife and brothers-in-law. The informer said that the accused were trying to flee to Bihar. "Immediately, a team led by ACP Suresh Kaushik and inspector Ashok Kumar was formed to arrest the accused," said additional CP Ravindra Yadav said.

The SOS team apprehended Janki and Vinod, who were packing their bags, from their house in Bawana. During questioning, both tried to mislead the police team but broke down under sustained interrogation and confessed to have murdered Ram.

The accused revealed that Ram sold one of his houses for around Rs 7 lakh and purchased another house for Rs 4 lakh. Janki said Ram had developed an illicit relation with a woman in the area and had spent the remaining amount received from the sale of the house on her.

This led to frequent quarrels between the couple and Ram often beat her up, Janki claimed. They had a big fight when Janki caught him trying to take away property documents of the house with intentions of transferring it on the woman's name.

In December 2012, she shared her problem with Vinod and Jhagru, who assured to help her. For two weeks before the murder, the accused held Ram captive in a room on the first floor of his house. They told the neighbours that he had gone to his native village.

On the New Year's Eve, they made Ram consume a lot of alcohol but he did not get drunk enough. The next day, they made him drink more alcohol until he was extremely inebriated and then Jhagru smothered Ram with a pillow while Vinod and Janki pinned down his hands, police said.

That night, they could not dispose of the body. Next evening, when there was dense fog, they put the body in a gunny bag and took it to a nearby isolated field and buried it in a pit. Yadav said they had recovered the skeleton and remnants of the body on the instance of the accused with the help of a mobile crime team and forensic experts. 
 http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/Missing-activists-bones-found-wife-killed-him/articleshow/20963903.cms 

Women named in dowry harassment jump before train

Women named in dowry harassment jump before train

JAIPUR: Depressed over a case of dowry harassment lodged against them, a woman and her 30-year-old daughter committed suicide by jumping before a train in Bikaner on Saturday. The case had been registered by the woman's daughter-in-law last month.
According to the police, the victims, Kiran Puri, a widow (54) and her daughter Gitika (30) were residents of Pawanpuri area.

"Kiran's son had a dispute with his wife. After which the wife accused him, Kiran and Gitika of dowry harassment. They claimed that they were innocent and were being harassed," said a police officer.
After lodging the FIR last month, the police arrested the husband, his mother Kiran and his sister Gitika. "While the man was sent to judicial custody, Kiran and Gitika were released on bail," said the officer.
On Saturday, Kiran and Gitika went to the railway tracks near Vyas Colony in Bikaner around 4am and jumped before a train. While Kiran died on the spot, Gitika was rushed to hospital in critical condition. She also succumbed to injuries while undergoing treatment.
"We have launched an investigation whether the two women were harassed," said the officer. 

http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-07-07/jaipur/40420237_1_police-officer-bikaner-railway-tracks