Latest news

Showing posts with label irrevocable breakdown of marriage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label irrevocable breakdown of marriage. Show all posts

Monday, 26 August 2013

RS approves bill to make divorce friendly for women

The Bill allows both parties to file for divorce on the ground of "irretrievable breakdown" of marriage.

Rajya Sabha on Monday approved a proposal to make divorce friendly for women as it provides for the wife getting share in the husband’s immovable property after “irretrievable breakdown” of marriage.
The Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill seeks to empower the courts to decide the compensation amount from the husband’s inherited and inheritable property for the wife and children once the marriage legally ends.
The Bill allows both parties to file for divorce on the ground of “irretrievable breakdown” of marriage. Both parties have to live apart for at least three years before filing for such a petition.
Provisions have been made to restrict grant of a decree of divorce on ground of “irretrievable breakdown” of marriage if the court is satisfied that adequate provision for maintenance of children has not been made consistently with financial capacity of the parties to the marriage.
Also, the wife has the right to oppose the grant of a divorce on the ground that the dissolution could result in grave financial hardship.
Replying to a debate on the bill, Law Minister Kapil Sibal said it is “a historic peace of legislation” in a patriarchal society like India where women, who constitute 50 per cent of the population, own only two per cent of the assets.
He said the divorce is “gender neutral” as either the wife or the husband can seek divorce. However, the right over property will not be gender neutral as wife can lay claim on husband’s immovable property.
The Bill also provides that a court can take an ex parte decision on granting divorce if one of the two parties refuse to move a joint application.
As per the existing laws, the parties have to move a motion jointly between 6 and 18 months in case of divorce on grounds of mutual consent.
However, it has been observed that in several cases one of the parties do not turn up for filing of motion jointly with the other party leading the party desirous of divorce hapless and remediless.
The amendment has been done to mitigate such hardships, said the statement of objects and reasons of the Bill.
During discussions, several MPs across party lines suggested the Bill be made gender neutral and should not be confined to Hindu marriages only.
The Bill seeks to amend Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and the Special Marriage Act, 1954.
Mr. Sibal, however, noted that the legislation is in context of Hindu Marriage Act and the Special Marriage Act, a couple has a choice to get registered under the Special Marriage Act.
He said it would be the courts that would decided about the division of property post divorce.
“We have to trust our judges...Judges...will decide what (amount of) property will given to women,” he said.
The Minister, however, said there was no amendment which works against women and works in favour of men.
He said the Members of Parliament should show that they are on side of women in a patriarchal society.
Earlier, Najma A. Heptulla (BJP) said divorce is considered a taboo in India and efforts should be made to ensure that family structure remains intact.
She accused the government of not doing anything for the 10 crore women belonging to Muslim community. She promised BJP’s support to any legislation for betterment of Muslim women.
She also said there should be only one law for all women in the country.
As per the statement of objects and reasons of the bill, Hindu Marriage Act and the Special Marriage Act have proved to be inadequate to deal with the issue where there has been irretrievable breakdown of marriage and therefore the need was felt for the amendments.
Supreme Court too had pointed out the necessity to introduce irretrievable breakdown of marriage and mutual consent as grounds for grant of divorce in all cases.
“Having regards to the recommendations of the Law Commission of India and the observation of the Hon’ble Supreme Court...it is proposed to amend the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and the Special Marriage Act, 1954, so as to provide for irretrievable breakdown of marriage as a ground of divorce thereunder subject to certain safeguards to the wife and affected children,” the statement said.
The Law Minister said husbands too can move courts for irretrievable breakdown of marriage.
Ram Prakash (Cong), Narendra Kumar Kashyap (BSP), Jharna Das Baidya (CPI-M), Derek O’ Brien (TMC), Arvind Kumar Singh (SP), Renubala Pradhan (BJD), Vandana Chavan (NCP), Bharatkumar Raut (SS) and Gyan Prakash Pilania (BJP) also participated in the discussion. 


Marriage amendment bill 2010

PURUSHAVAKASA SAMRAKSHANA SAMITHI


Men's right group protests against 'discriminatory' proposed marriage law


A men's rights group on Sunday took out a rally protesting against the proposed Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2002, alleging it would breakdown the traditional family system by introducing no-fault divorce and was heavily loaded against the husband.
"Similar laws in the west have led to breakdown of the traditional family system. In the US, while only 20 per cent of couples who married in 1950 ended up divorced, about 50 per cent of couples who married in 1970 did so after the no-fault divorce came into being," said Hriday spokesperson Anil Gupta.
He said as per the proposed legislation, which has received the nod from the cabinet, a wife can walk out of the marriage on her sweet will.

http://ibnlive.in.com/news/mens-right-group-protests-against-discriminatory-proposed-marriage-law/417184-3.html

Rajya Sabha passes marriage laws amendment bill

New Delhi, Aug 26 (IANS) The Rajya Sabha Monday passed a bill to amend marriage laws which seeks to provide for irretrievable breakdown of marriage as a ground for divorce, subject to certain safeguards to the wife and affected children.
The Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2010 was passed by voice vote. It seeks to amend the Hindu Marriage Act 1955 and the Special Marriages Act, 1954.
Replying to the brief debate, Law Minister Kapil Sibal said there was need to protect women's rights as the society was still patriarchal.
"So let's be clear. Legislations are a message that MPs are on the side of women in a patriarchal society. With this intent we bring this bill," he said.
Speaking on the amendments, Sibal said the share of wife in husband's self-acquired property will be decided by court. He said the wife also has a share in the movable property of her husband.
He said the wife does not have share in inherited property but its value will be taken into account while fixing the amount of alimony to her.
He said either husband or wife can cite irretrievable breakdown of marriage as a ground of divorce.
There have been concerns that provisions of earlier marriage acts were inadequate in cases of irretrievable breakdown of marriage.

http://www.newstrackindia.com/newsdetails/2013/08/26/340--Rajya-Sabha-passes-marriage-laws-amendment-bill-.html 

Sunday, 11 August 2013

MRA, SIFF up in arms against new bill on marriage law

MRA, SIFF up in arms against new bill on marriage law

Men’s activists have threatened to carry out nationwide demonstrations outside the houses of those Members of Parliament who support the new Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2010.
The Men’s Rights Association (MRA) and Save India Family Foundation (SIFF) terms the bill as extremely anti-male, anti-husband and anti-marriage that seeks to incentivise divorce. They have opposed discussion on the bill in the ongoing monsoon session of Parliament as they feel not enough discussion have been done while formulating the bill.
Both the groups insist that the bill, which gives divorced women an equal stake in the husbands’ ancestral property, will result in several damaging results, such as a men being scared of marriage. They also say that it gives the women an unfair advantage. The activists have even declared that not only will they not vote for any MPS who vote in favour of the bill, but also will agitate outside their houses.
MRA’s city president Atit Rajpara said that since the past two weeks, they had met at least 45 Mps and the city Mayor who gave them a memorandum opposing the act. “We will sit outside MPs and politicians who will be seen advocating this Act, and ask them to adopt us and give a share from their properties,” he said.
According to the new law, the wife is entitled to have a share in the husband’s inherited property during the divorce. The decision regarding the monthly spousal support and how the property is to be divided has to be decided by the judges.
SIFF and MRA have asked the government to revise the law and not to table it in the current session of Parliament. The NGOs have also called for a more gender-neutral law that calculates the alimony depending on the woman’s contribution to the household and the duration of the marriage, among other things.
SIFF president Rajesh Vakharia said, “Any marriage law amendment has to be seen in a horrified manner taking into account other laws like shared monthly alimony, parenting, child support and others. The decision has been taken in haste. This will not curb the crime but instead may get misused. There is no provision where a woman will have to compensate to husband and his family if she woman misuse the law. If this act is passed, men will be pinned for life. The man will have to keep paying alimony to his divorced wife even after parting with his own property and ancestral property.”
Today, a man gets married mostly at the age 30, as he waits to become financially stable, with a fair salary, lot of savings and a house. If this act is passed, a male and his family will lose all this in case of a divorce. Females get concession even in income tax, Vakharia explained.
Rajpara said, “We are already witnessing many fake and extortion cases filed by women. The cases are pending for years and if this act comes men will stop marrying. This act was adopted by China, but was ruled out in 2010 after it’s widespread misuse resulted into males in China afraid of marriages. I don’t understand why such atrocities against Hindu husbands only? As per the provisions, the husband will pay 50 per cent property in case of a divorce. The remaining 50 per cent will be lost in the endless court battles. We all need a single civil matrimonial law that applies to all Indians irrespective of religion and gender. Such biased laws will lead to men committing suicide or killing wives instead of fighting legally.”
d_chaitraly@dnaindia.net

http://epaper.dnaindia.com/story.aspx?id=50143&boxid=17046&ed_date=2013-8-11&ed_code=820040&ed_page=3#.Ugb5l2_X5b8.gmail 

Saturday, 10 August 2013

विवाह विधेयकाला पाठिंबा देणाऱ्या खासदारांशी घटस्फोट

विवाह विधेयकाला पाठिंबा देणाऱ्या खासदारांशी घटस्फोट

म.टा. विशेष प्रतिनिधी नागपूर


विवाह सुधारणा कायदा विधेयक २०१० ला जे खासदार पाठिंबा देतील, त्यांच्यावर देशभरात बहिष्कार टाकण्याचा इशारा मेन्स राइट असोसिएशनने (एमआरए) दिला आहे. हे विधेयक पुरुषांवर अन्याय करणारे, पतीविरोधी आहे. ते पारित झाल्यास देशात घटस्फोटांचे प्रमाण वाढेल. कुटुंबे तुटतील, असे 'एमआरए'चे म्हणणे आहे.

देशभरातील पुरुष अधिकार कार्यकर्ते या विधेयकाविरोधात रस्त्यावर उतरत आहेत. या कायद्यातील तरतुदीच इतक्या भयंकर आहेत की, हे विधेयक संमत झाल्यास पुरुष लग्न करणेच थांबवतील. या कायद्यामुळे कुटुंबांचे विभाजन होईल, घटस्फोटांचे प्रमाण वाढेल, विवाह म्हणजे संपत्ती हस्तांतरण ब्यूरो होईल, महिला संपत्तीसाठीच लग्न करतील आणि ती मिळाली की लग्न मोडून टाकतील. या कायद्यामुळे समाजात हिंसाचार वाढेल. कारण पती-पत्नीचे आपसात पटत नाही, या कारणावरून कष्टाने मिळविलेली संपत्ती पत्नीला देऊन टाकावी लागेल. त्याचे अनिष्ट परिणाम होऊ शकतात, या कायद्यामुळे समाजात महिलांची भीती आणि त्यांच्याविषयी द्वेष निर्माण होईल, विवाहित पुरुषांच्या आत्महत्यांचे प्रमाण वाढेल, अशी भीती संघटनेने व्यक्त केली आहे.

त्यामुळे सरकारने या अधिवेशनात हे विधेयक संमत करू नये, असेही आवाहन संघटनेने केले आहे. या विधेयकात अनेक त्रुटी आहेत. संसदेत त्यावर चर्चा होऊन त्या त्रुटी दूर करण्याची गरज आहे. जे खासदार संसदेत या विधेयकाच्या बाजूने भूमिका घेतील, त्यांच्यावर पुरुष संघटनांचे कार्यकर्ते बहिष्कार टाकतील व येत्या निवडणुकीत त्यांच्या विरोधात मतदान करतील, असेही जाहीर करण्यात आले आहे.

काय आहे विधेयक? हा हिंदू विवाह संशोधन दुरुस्ती कायदा-२०१० आहे. याअंतर्गत घटस्फोटाच्या वेळी पत्नीला पतीची ५० टक्के संपत्ती मिळते. तसेच वडिलोपार्जित संपत्तीतील हिस्साही मिळतो. यात पतीला काहीही बोलण्याचा वा आक्षेप घेण्याचा अधिकार नाही. विशेष म्हणजे ही संपत्ती ढापण्यासाठी वेळेची निश्चिती नाही. लग्नाच्या दुसऱ्या दिवशीही पत्नी संपत्ती घेऊ शकते.

मानवी हक्कांचे उल्लंघन करणारे हे विधेयक आहे. फक्त आणि फक्त महिलांचाच विचार करणारे हे विधेयक हाणून पाडण्याची आमची तयारी आहे. त्यासाठी या विधेयकाला समर्थन देणाऱ्या खासदारांना 'टार्गेट' करू. एकीकडे महिला सक्षमीकरणाच्या गप्पा मारायच्या अन् दुसरीकडे दुसऱ्यांच्या आयत्या संपत्तीवर डल्ला मारण्याचा भिकारडेपणा करायचा, असा हा मामला आहे. -राजेश वखारिया, मध्य भारत अध्यक्ष, सेव्ह इंडिया फॅमिली फाउंडेशन.

http://maharashtratimes.indiatimes.com/maharashtra/nagpur-vidarbha/---/articleshow/21733943.cms 

Friday, 9 August 2013

Government bid to give wives inherited property share

Government bid to give wives inherited property share

NEW DELHI: The Union Cabinet is likely to discuss an amendment to the marriage laws which, in the event of a divorce, would give the wife an equal share of not only the property acquired by the husband during or before the marriage but also his inherited or inheritable property.

The proposed amendment, that is likely to be controversial, aims to redefine the phrase 'residential property' to include not just the residential house but also other properties acquired by the husband.
In case other members of the family (apart from the husband) also have rights in the inherited property and it is impractical to divide it, the amendment proposes to compensate the wife with an equivalent amount of money in place of her share.
The proposed change aims to give the wife an equal share in the property regardless of whether it was acquired before or after marriage and regardless of whether it is only in the husband's name or held jointly.
The changes in the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill, being brought under pressure from civil society as well as a section of MPs, is expected to come up in the cabinet meeting on Wednesday.
The government had earlier introduced the amendment bill in order to alter the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and the Special Marriage Act, 1954, to introduce the option of divorce on grounds of "irretrievable breakdown of marriage".

The government had brought in a Bill to grant the wife the right to a share in the movable and immovable residential properties. But this was found wanting by some civil society groups who demanded that the wife should have a right not just in residential property but also all immovable properties of the husband.
Responding to the criticism, the government has now proposed to make another couple of amendments to provide a share to divorcing women in not just acquired properties but also inherited property and bringing in immovable assets beyond the residential house.
The government has decided to create a special provision in case of inherited properties in light of a Supreme Court order that one co-owner of joint family property does not have the right to sell his undivided share. Considering the Supreme Court orders, the government contended that giving over half the share of the husband in inherited property could lock the divorcing wife in to future litigation. Therefore, the amendment provides for the court to decide if she should get money in lieu of her share in such cases.

http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-04-30/india/38929151_1_inherited-property-joint-family-property-special-marriage-act

You are here - HomeNewsCity Story City Group decries ‘anti-men’ marriage bill

 You are here - HomeNewsCity Story City  Group decries ‘anti-men’ marriage bill

Citing that the provisions of the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2010, are making marriage the ‘property transfer bureau’, members of the Men’s Rights Association (MRA), Pune, which functions as an all-India body, has given a clarion call against the Act.

They have now resolved to not vote for the members of Parliament (MPs) supporting the Bill in the country’s top legislative body for the next general election. The members held a meeting in the city on Thursday.

Looking at the issue as an opportunity to unite, the group has appealed to men to not invest in real estate after this bill is passed, since it has provisions to give

wife the half share of husband’s property, including property acquired before marriage and the property that a man inherits. They claimed marriages will be converted into ‘property transfer bureau’ after this Bill is passed.

The association has called it an anti-men, anti-husband and anti-marriage Bill, which is likely to be debated in the ongoing monsoon session of Parliament.

As part of their campaign against the Bill, the activists have till date met over 25 MPs belonging to various parties to make them aware about the issue.

Talking to Pune Mirror, Atit Rajpara, founder president of MRA-Pune, said, “Despite requests from the men’s groups across the country, the government failed to pay heed.

Not even a single suggestion given by us have been considered. We have done written several times to the MPs, but nothing has happened.”


http://www.punemirror.in/index.aspx?page=article&sectid=2&contentid=2013080920130809103836949de0a8c74&title=Group-decries-%E2%80%98antimen%E2%80%99-marriage-bill 

Thursday, 8 August 2013

'Draconian' amendment in Hindu Marriage Act gives wives final say in divorce cases; men's rights groups not amused

'Draconian' amendment in Hindu Marriage Act gives wives final say in divorce cases; men's rights groups not amused 


Pune: Upset over the latest amendments in the Hindu Marriage Act which virtually give wives a final say in divorce 
 
cases, Men’s Rights Association (MRA) on Saturday staged a protest against the legislation which they term as 'draconian'.
 
"The bill has a provision giving power to the courts to not grant a divorce unless the wife was paid adequate amount of 
 
money in the name of financial security of the woman. Such powers may result in harassment of men," MRA president Atit Rajpara said.
 
He also said the bill also provides special powers to wives to oppose the divorce if she was unhappy with the money she received from the husband under section IPC 498 (A), domestic violence act and several other maintenance laws.
 
According to the MRA, such clauses are outright anti-male and gender-biased and therefore men’s rights activists and organisations are opposing them. Rajpara said the mens’ rights organisations want the bill to be gender-neutral.
 

Men's rights activists oppose amendment to marriage law

Men's rights activists oppose amendment to marriage law


NAGPUR: Men's rights activists from all across the country are calling on the society to oppose the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2010. Calling the proposed bill as an anti-male and anti-marriage entity, the men have opposed discussion of the bill in the ongoing monsoon session of Parliament as they feel not enough discussion have been done while formulating the bill. The activists insist that the bill, which gives divorced women an equal stake in the husband's ancestral property, will result in several damaging results, with men being scared of marrying. They also say that it gives the women an unfair advantage. The activists have even declared that not only will they not vote for any member of Parliament who votes in favour of the bill, they would also actively lobby against all such MPs.

"Most men do not marry until they are well settled in life and have a house of their own. For that, they toil day in and day out in order to eke out a living worthy to possess a property. And tomorrow, with the passage of this law, if a man tends to lose his hard-earned property, then men and their families would see no reason for marriage," said city-based men's right activist Rajesh Vakharia. He also said that such laws will only promote the concept of divorce and open the doors of unfair use of laws by women. "Such laws only feed fuel to the fire of gynophobia (fear of women) in the society. There are enough false cases and extortion faced by men under laws regarding domestic violence," said Vakharia. Activists have urged the government to pass the bill only after sufficient debate, discussion and deliberations, and take all stakeholders into confidence.
 http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/nagpur/Mens-rights-activists-oppose-amendment-to-marriage-law/articleshow/21703825.cms