मलकागंज : पुलिस को मिली 200 पर्चियां
नई दिल्ली।।
9 साल की अपनी बेटी खुशी को जहर देकर खुद भी सूइसाइड करने वाले प्रवीण
कुमार (42) अपनी पत्नी को रोजाना एक लेटर लिखा करते थे। उनकी पत्नी की मौत
पिछले साल 30 सितंबर को हो गई थी। वह उनसे बहुत प्यार करते थे। उनके पास से
पुलिस को 200 से अधिक छोटी-छोटी पर्चियां मिली हैं। जिन पर उन्होंने अपनी
पत्नी के बारे में ही लिखा था।
प्रवीण और इनकी बेटी खुशी के शव
रविवार दोपहर को नॉर्थ दिल्ली में मलकागंज की बस्ती जुलाहन में एक कमरे के
घर में मिले थे। दोनों ने कोई जहरीला पदार्थ खाकर जान दी थी। पुलिस का कहना
है कि प्रवीण ने पहले अपनी बेटी को जहरीला पदार्थ खिलाया होगा बाद में खुद
खाया होगा। दोनों शवों के सोमवार को सब्जी मंडी मॉर्च्युरी में
पोस्टमॉर्टम कराए गए। उसमें पता लगा है कि सल्फास की गोलियां खाकर जान दी
गई।
डीसीपी सिंधु पिल्लै का कहना है कि ढेर सारी पर्चियों में से
एक में प्रवीण ने अपनी मौत के समय और दिन को भी लिख रखा था। उसमें
उन्होंने लिखा हुआ था कि वह 9 जून की सुबह 3 बजे जान दे देंगे।
http://navbharattimes.indiatimes.com/delhi/crime/mlkaganj-police-found-200-slips/articleshow/20528720.cms
Friday, 14 June 2013
यूपी: आधी रात को 'प्रेमी' के साथ पकड़ी गईं अखिलेश की विधायक, 'पति' ने किया हंगामा
यूपी: आधी रात को 'प्रेमी' के साथ पकड़ी गईं अखिलेश की विधायक, 'पति' ने किया हंगामा
लक्ष्मी का कहना है कि दिलीप वार्ष्णेय से उनकी शादी नहीं हुई है।
दोनों लिव इन रिलेशनशिप में थे। साथ-साथ रहने के दौरान उनके दो बच्चे भी
हैं। अब दिलीप से उनके कोई संबंध नहीं हैं। उनका कहना था कि दिलीप
वार्ष्णेय उनको बदनाम करने की धमकी देकर दो करोड़ रुपए मांग रहे थे।
उन्होंने मुकुल अग्रवाल को पार्टी कार्यकर्ता बताते हुए प्रेमी होने से
इंकार किया।
http://www.bhaskar.com/article/UP-LUCK-love-affair-of-sp-mla-lakshmi-gautam-4291529-NOR.html?HT
लखनऊ. चंदौसी की सपा विधायक लक्ष्मी गौतम कथित प्रेम संबंधों को लेकर चर्चा में हैं। विधायक के कथित पति दिलीप वार्ष्णेय का कहना है कि विधायक प्रेमी के साथ रह
रही हैं। सपा विधायक लक्ष्मी गौतम के पति दिलीप वार्ष्णेय रात के अंधेरे
में टीडीआई सिटी कालोनी में के ई ब्लाक के फ्लैट में कुछ लोगों के साथ
पहुंचे। फ्लैट में चंदौसी के मुकुल अग्रवाल को देखकर वह भड़क गए उन्होंने
हंगामा शुरू कर दिया। दिलीप का दावा है कि लक्ष्मी गौतम उनकी पत्नी हैं, वह यहां प्रेमी मुकुल अग्रवाल के साथ रह रही हैं। (प्रेग्नेंट बीवी से अप्राकृतिक सेक्स के दौरान हिंसक हो गया था बसपा नेता!)
http://www.bhaskar.com/article/UP-LUCK-love-affair-of-sp-mla-lakshmi-gautam-4291529-NOR.html?HT
Outraging modesty of women: Victim's version enough to nail accused, says HC
Outraging modesty of women: Victim's version enough to nail accused, says HC
The Bombay High Court has held that in cases of outraging modesty of women, the evidence tendered by the victim should be sufficient to nail the accused and it was not necessary to seek corroboration.
The court observed this while finding a man guilty of outraging the modesty of his brother's wife. In this regard, the Judge relied entirely upon the evidence given by the victim.
"Such evidence can be given only by the victim herself.
There is no other to see, depose or corroborate it. There have been divorce proceedings between the complainant and her husband. She was living in the same house with her child. The family members would naturally not help her if such an incident transpired," noted Justice Roshan Dalvi.
The victim has been cross-examined at length. However, no discrepancies were pointed out in her evidence. "No other can depose on her behalf", the Judge noted in her order on June 10.
The court dismissed an appeal filed by Ashok Ghodke against a Pune magistrate's order finding him guilty of outraging the modesty of his sister-in-law. However, he and other family members had been acquitted of charges of cruelty (section 498A) and 506 (criminal intimidation) of Indian Penal Code.
The high court also upheld the lower court's order of February 24, 2009, rejecting the plea of the accused that there was no independent witness in the case.
"There would be none under such circumstances. Only her (the victim's) little son was present with her. The incident happened after midnight. Hence the neighbours would be asleep", the judge observed.
"She was not allowed to shout when she tried to shout because the applicant herein closed her mouth. He would have overpowered her. The learned magistrate has rightly observed that multiplication of witnesses is unnecessary and such evidence needs no corroboration of any sort", Justice Dalvi remarked.
http://www.indianexpress.com/news/outraging-modesty-of-women-victims-version-enough-to-nail-accused-says-hc/1128551/
The Bombay High Court has held that in cases of outraging modesty of women, the evidence tendered by the victim should be sufficient to nail the accused and it was not necessary to seek corroboration.
The court observed this while finding a man guilty of outraging the modesty of his brother's wife. In this regard, the Judge relied entirely upon the evidence given by the victim.
"Such evidence can be given only by the victim herself.
There is no other to see, depose or corroborate it. There have been divorce proceedings between the complainant and her husband. She was living in the same house with her child. The family members would naturally not help her if such an incident transpired," noted Justice Roshan Dalvi.
The victim has been cross-examined at length. However, no discrepancies were pointed out in her evidence. "No other can depose on her behalf", the Judge noted in her order on June 10.
The court dismissed an appeal filed by Ashok Ghodke against a Pune magistrate's order finding him guilty of outraging the modesty of his sister-in-law. However, he and other family members had been acquitted of charges of cruelty (section 498A) and 506 (criminal intimidation) of Indian Penal Code.
The high court also upheld the lower court's order of February 24, 2009, rejecting the plea of the accused that there was no independent witness in the case.
"There would be none under such circumstances. Only her (the victim's) little son was present with her. The incident happened after midnight. Hence the neighbours would be asleep", the judge observed.
"She was not allowed to shout when she tried to shout because the applicant herein closed her mouth. He would have overpowered her. The learned magistrate has rightly observed that multiplication of witnesses is unnecessary and such evidence needs no corroboration of any sort", Justice Dalvi remarked.
http://www.indianexpress.com/news/outraging-modesty-of-women-victims-version-enough-to-nail-accused-says-hc/1128551/
Suicides: Thousands of helpless men are victimized every year, says SIFF
Suicides: Thousands of helpless men are victimized every year, says SIFF
Often women are portrayed as victims, while men are seen as
abusers. The arrest of Suraj Pancholi in the Jiah Khan Suicide case is
not an example of the perils of lovesick women, but more evidence of an
irresponsible police force says Save Indian Family Foundation, a
non-profit NGO fighting for men’s rights, gender equality and family
harmony
Suraj Pancholi, son of Bollywood actor Aditya Pancholi, was arrested and sent to jail for abetting the suicide of actress Jiah Khan. The actress attempted suicide eight months ago
and
nothing was done to ensure that she does not repeat it. Is suicide a
solution to break-ups or separation? It is absurd to assume that all
human relations will remain everlasting in this age of modernity. Women
are portrayed as victims, while men are seen as abusers. Pancholi’s
arrest is not an example of the perils of lovesick women, but more
evidence of an irresponsible police force, says Save Indian Family
Foundation (SIFF), a non-profit NGO fighting for men’s rights, gender
equality and family harmony.
According to a release from SIFF, Suraj Pancholi is not alone. Thousands of men across India have faced threats of suicide from their wives from time to time, if they do not meet her unreasonable demands. These men are scared. These abusive wives refuse to come to a counsellor or a psychiatrist. These men cannot run away from home or file for divorce, fearing that this may prompt her to commit suicide. They suffer mental and physical abuse from possessive, controlling and suspicious wives. In fact, the society laughs at them as “harassed husbands” rather than helping the man and making arrangements for counselling of such women. This phenomenon is now getting extended to relationships before marriage, as well. Being obsessively possessive and controlling is not a sign of love.
“India is sitting on a ticking time bomb as the society refuses to recognize the issue of threats of suicide inside marriages or in relationships. Society just behaves as if such incidents are rare or wishes that this problem will go away on its own. Then, it recommends revenge on the man if the woman commits suicide. Home ministry data says, 24% of all suicides in India are due to family reasons and 3.4% due to failed love affairs,” SIFF said.
This abetment to suicide law is very selectively applied by the police. When a husband commits suicide blaming torture by wife and in-laws, the police refuse to arrest the woman and her parents. However, if a wife commits suicide, the husband and in-laws go to prison for six months to two years and are presumed guilty until proven innocent. Is the life of a man cheap? Males are the disposable gender.
According to the NGO, Suraj Pancholi and many men are victimized as the hatred against men is fuelled by mass hysteria after incidents of rape. SIFF demands an end to large scale gender hate, stereotyping and the attitude to judge men harshly. If hate cannot solve communal or religious problems, then why it is assumed that blaming men and spreading hate against men will solve crimes against women?
Threat of suicide by man is actually defined as domestic violence under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA), which is applicable to both marriages and live-in relationships. A woman can get a restraining order from a court against her husband and boyfriend if they threaten suicide. However, society and the women’s organizations force the government to refuse to protect men from such forms of domestic violence. If they had, then Suraj Pancholi would have got a restraining order and would have legally forced Jiah Khan to get psychiatric help.
Many actors like Shah Rukh Khan to Amitabh Bacchan have publicly proclaimed, “I am ashamed of being a man”. Shaming all men for the crimes of a few is nothing but anti-male hate or misandry. If misogyny is not healthy for the society, then how can misandry create a better society? We hope, Bollywood actors realize that in this grave hour, SIFF said.
Suraj Pancholi, son of Bollywood actor Aditya Pancholi, was arrested and sent to jail for abetting the suicide of actress Jiah Khan. The actress attempted suicide eight months ago
and
nothing was done to ensure that she does not repeat it. Is suicide a
solution to break-ups or separation? It is absurd to assume that all
human relations will remain everlasting in this age of modernity. Women
are portrayed as victims, while men are seen as abusers. Pancholi’s
arrest is not an example of the perils of lovesick women, but more
evidence of an irresponsible police force, says Save Indian Family
Foundation (SIFF), a non-profit NGO fighting for men’s rights, gender
equality and family harmony.According to a release from SIFF, Suraj Pancholi is not alone. Thousands of men across India have faced threats of suicide from their wives from time to time, if they do not meet her unreasonable demands. These men are scared. These abusive wives refuse to come to a counsellor or a psychiatrist. These men cannot run away from home or file for divorce, fearing that this may prompt her to commit suicide. They suffer mental and physical abuse from possessive, controlling and suspicious wives. In fact, the society laughs at them as “harassed husbands” rather than helping the man and making arrangements for counselling of such women. This phenomenon is now getting extended to relationships before marriage, as well. Being obsessively possessive and controlling is not a sign of love.
“India is sitting on a ticking time bomb as the society refuses to recognize the issue of threats of suicide inside marriages or in relationships. Society just behaves as if such incidents are rare or wishes that this problem will go away on its own. Then, it recommends revenge on the man if the woman commits suicide. Home ministry data says, 24% of all suicides in India are due to family reasons and 3.4% due to failed love affairs,” SIFF said.
This abetment to suicide law is very selectively applied by the police. When a husband commits suicide blaming torture by wife and in-laws, the police refuse to arrest the woman and her parents. However, if a wife commits suicide, the husband and in-laws go to prison for six months to two years and are presumed guilty until proven innocent. Is the life of a man cheap? Males are the disposable gender.
According to the NGO, Suraj Pancholi and many men are victimized as the hatred against men is fuelled by mass hysteria after incidents of rape. SIFF demands an end to large scale gender hate, stereotyping and the attitude to judge men harshly. If hate cannot solve communal or religious problems, then why it is assumed that blaming men and spreading hate against men will solve crimes against women?
Threat of suicide by man is actually defined as domestic violence under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA), which is applicable to both marriages and live-in relationships. A woman can get a restraining order from a court against her husband and boyfriend if they threaten suicide. However, society and the women’s organizations force the government to refuse to protect men from such forms of domestic violence. If they had, then Suraj Pancholi would have got a restraining order and would have legally forced Jiah Khan to get psychiatric help.
Many actors like Shah Rukh Khan to Amitabh Bacchan have publicly proclaimed, “I am ashamed of being a man”. Shaming all men for the crimes of a few is nothing but anti-male hate or misandry. If misogyny is not healthy for the society, then how can misandry create a better society? We hope, Bollywood actors realize that in this grave hour, SIFF said.
FIR against 4 women for court paper theft
FIR against 4 women for court paper theft
NEW DELHI: Following a trial court's order, Delhi Police has registered an FIR against five members of a family, including four women, for allegedly stealing documents from the court's records and forging the order of a magistrate.
Metropolitan magistrate Pawan Singh Rajawat had directed Delhi Police to register the FIR on the complaint of a man against his estranged wife alleging theft and forgery of judicial records. "I am satisfied that this is a fit case to direct the police authorities to conduct a thorough investigation on the allegation of the complainant regarding theft and forgery of judicial records," the magistrate had said, adding that the accused should not be arrested till the police found concrete evidence against them.
The case dates back to an FIR registered against the man in 2009 under Section 498A IPC (husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty) on a complaint made by his wife. The man had alleged that his wife had annexed many forged bills with respect to 'stridhan'. A complaint was made in this before Metropolitan Magistrate Neeraj Gaur who had directed the police to register an FIR for the offence of forgery on January 19, 2012.
The wife had moved a revision petition challenging this order. The man's counsel said when he was issued a notice about the revision petition, he realized the accused had attached with her petition a copy of his complaint on which Gaur had passed the order on the FIR. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/FIR-against-4-women-for-court-paper-theft/articleshow/20581518.cms
NEW DELHI: Following a trial court's order, Delhi Police has registered an FIR against five members of a family, including four women, for allegedly stealing documents from the court's records and forging the order of a magistrate.
Metropolitan magistrate Pawan Singh Rajawat had directed Delhi Police to register the FIR on the complaint of a man against his estranged wife alleging theft and forgery of judicial records. "I am satisfied that this is a fit case to direct the police authorities to conduct a thorough investigation on the allegation of the complainant regarding theft and forgery of judicial records," the magistrate had said, adding that the accused should not be arrested till the police found concrete evidence against them.
The case dates back to an FIR registered against the man in 2009 under Section 498A IPC (husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty) on a complaint made by his wife. The man had alleged that his wife had annexed many forged bills with respect to 'stridhan'. A complaint was made in this before Metropolitan Magistrate Neeraj Gaur who had directed the police to register an FIR for the offence of forgery on January 19, 2012.
The wife had moved a revision petition challenging this order. The man's counsel said when he was issued a notice about the revision petition, he realized the accused had attached with her petition a copy of his complaint on which Gaur had passed the order on the FIR. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/FIR-against-4-women-for-court-paper-theft/articleshow/20581518.cms
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)